• Advertise
  • Request Review
  • Write for Us
  • Privacy
  • Login

Theatre Bubble

The UK Theatre Network

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Reviews
  • News
  • Features
  • Spotlight
  • Opinions
  • Interviews
  • Guides
  • Tickets

The Seagull- Theatro Technis

April 17, 2015 by Verity Healey Leave a Comment

Review of: The Seagull
Price:
£15/ £12

Reviewed by: Verity Healey
Rating:
2
On April 17, 2015
Last modified:April 17, 2015

Summary:

seeks to revolutionise but ends up being a little confusing

More Details

This reimagining of Chekhov’s The Seagull flings us into the chaotic dark world of WW1. It’s prevailing theme, on top of Chekov’s multitudinous complex ones, is flashback, in tune with the legacy of lunacy WW1 left us with: shell shock. Some of the cast in this new reworking seem in shell shock themselves though, perhaps as a stylistic device.  Constantine and Dorn both see active service in the interval years between Act Three and Act Four, although there is no sense that Constantine has been shaped by his experiences or that it lingers even in the background of his consciousness, except that he needs to find new ways of writing. Sorin is an ex- member of the foreign office who is just realising that ‘his life’s work has been to start the greatest war the world has ever seen’. It’s a good idea, but it’s not there onstage. And the malaise and terror of the war, which is hinted at at the very edges of this production through sometimes powerful movement sequences, comes at the cost of forcing Chekhov’s thematic concerns- existentialism, generation conflict, the role of the artist in life and in love- into the background to roam in the shadows like unwanted ghosts. Nor is the conflict between militarist and pacifist literature, which is hinted at and could have  provided for some explosive dramatics between Constantine and Trigorin, explored in any great parallel to the role of the artist and his moral responsibilities in some of the reworked and improvised passages…

Screen Shot 2015-04-17 at 15.19.33

Trigorin, played here at the last moment by the director stepping in for an ill cast member, is meant to be one of the main four protagonists but he seems to be the focus in this uneven production. Nina is like wild Mr Rochester’s wife locked up in the attic and her attraction to Trigorin is not one born out of romantic idealism but a similar propensity to manipulate and control- she knows what she wants and how to get it with a breathtaking cruelty that never ceases. And while the actor’s use of her body reveals that her character has really embodied the spirit of a seagull, the tone is more Hitchcock’s The Birds and less Richard Bach. The interpretation seems much more narrow in focus for it. There is still an undercurrent of youth trying to uproot the old and being constantly repressed- but the conflicts between Constantine and Arkadina are smothered out by games of lotto, to which the characters continually return ( the link between this and their poverty is not really shored up).  Trigorin wins at the end of Act Four- the reason why seems partially obvious but surely we get it enough with the stuffed seagull Shamrayev keeps trying to hand him?

The production is trying to physicalise the play through movement, possibility of shape and integrated acts onstage with as little reliance on the text as possible- a text that is cut up and which the cast gasp and mutter as if suffering psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, reinforced by a continually flashing blue overhead spotlight. The fact we can’t hear what they say does not really help. And the audience are continually bashed around on the head with the movement idea at the expense of  breadth of character, rigour, self examination and story arc. It muffles the actors’ ability to pace and the scripted scenes rock along at a terrific rate, missing the chance for characters to engage with each other.  We don’t care what happens to them. Whilst it is quite extraordinary in its aim and ambition, and there are some well directed scenes where bourgeois indulgence and indifference contrasts sharply with sometimes raw emotion (but not the dogged determination Medvedenko is supposed to bring) it is hard to understand what this interpretation of The Seagull gains from being set in WW1- like Chekhov, it seeks to find a new language and tries to revolutionise what this play could  be-  all it does though is create a little confusion.

The Seagull runs on various dates Theatro Technis until 25th April

cast

Constantine- Michael Topolski

Nina- Charlotte Campbell

Arkadina- Kirsty Langley

Trigorin- Ryan Callaghan

Sorin- David Flynn

Dorn- Ben Scheck

Masha- Maria Birmingham

Medvedenko- Winston Wong

Polina- Gill Broderick

Shamrayev- Steve Ball

creatives

director- Justin Murray

producer- Gavin McAlinden

designer- Magdalena Hunt

lighting designer- Sam Miller

sound designer- Paul Freeman

movement director- Jude Evans

production manager- Talha Pirzada

lighting/ sound operator- Kristina Popova

assistant stage manager- Natalie Plunga

production photography- Mandy Gasson

Author: Verity HealeyI write about theatre, I write short stories/ poetry www.verityhealey.blogspot.com, I also sometimes make films.

Filed Under: Review Tagged With: Actors Gym, The Seagull, Theatro Technis

Join the discussion Cancel reply

INTERVIEW / Richard Vergette on Leaving Vietnam

We spoke to Richard Vergette, writer and performer of Leaving Vietnam. Richard plays a war veteran who feels ignored and [Read More]

Review / The Journey To Venice at the Finborough Theatre

Bjorg Vik’s play The Journey To Venice is a delightful production, entertaining yet full of pathos. A play with a [Read More]

INTERVIEW / Tzarini Meyler talks KITES at VAULT Festival

We spoke to Artistic Director of LipZinc Theatre, writer and performer Tzarini Meyler about her upcoming show at VAULT Festival [Read More]

INTERVIEW / Naomi Westerman talks BATMAN (aka Naomi’s Death Show)

We spoke to writer and performer Naomi Westerman from Little But Fierce about her upcoming show at VAULT Festival Can [Read More]

INTERVIEW / Angharad Jones on The Swearing Jar 

From New Perspectives, The Swearing Jar is a comedy about love, heartbreak, living with the past and accepting the future. We spoke to director Angharad [Read More]

Top Posts & Pages

  • 5 Stage Elements to Consider for a Rousing Theatrical Production
  • Tim Edge talks Under the Black Rock
  • Romeo and Juliet- Rose Theatre, Kingston Sublime Shakespeare.
  • Peter Pan at the National Theatre
  • Claire Cunningham talks 4 Legs Good in BE festival
  • The Role of Stage Manager in a Devising Company
  • Arts Funding as Propaganda
  • Ed Fringe 2016: Acting Alone, at Just Festival in St John's
  • Too High, Too Far, Too Soon- Tristan Bates Theatre
  • Kenneth Branagh, Imelda Staunton and more to feature in Tricycle Theatre's 'In Conversation with', hosted by Jim Carter
  • Verity Healey
    Author

  • April 17th, 2015
  • comment iconNo Comments
  • FacebookTweetLinkedInEmail

    Newsletter

    Enjoyed what you've read? Get even more great content directly to your inbox - Completely Free

    About Theatre Bubble

    Theatre Bubble is the news, review and blogging site created by Blue Pie Media and run by a dedicated team of outstanding editors and writers: we're always looking for new contributors - to find out more click here.

    Contact Us

    News: news@theatrebubble.com
    Reviews: reviews@theatrebubble.com
    Website: webmaster@theatrebubble.com

    Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2023 · Blue Pie Media

     

    Loading Comments...
     

      Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

      Email sent!